File under - 'Silly comments by middle-aged university managers'

“Last week I was walking across the DCU campus when I came upon a frantic young man in a car who, as he told me, had an urgent appointment in the university but couldn’t find anywhere to park. On this occasion I was able to help him, but these days we have constant car parking issues. In his book, The Uses of the University, Clark Kerr, the late chancellor of the University of California at Berkeley, suggested that a university president has three key tasks that the institution’s main stakeholders will expect to see achieved: ’sex for the students, athletics for the alumni, and parking for the faculty’. Only the last of these, Kerr suggested, presented a problem …” (more)

[Ferdinand von Prondzynski, Irish Times, 6 October]

I Hate You... Now, Can We Have Sex?

Dagny’s Entry [October 4, 2009]

Recently, I read a posting on a public site that had the following subject line: “Ladies listen closely, no BJ on the first date = no second date.” The author of this post went on to detail [in quite graphic terms] his feelings about women in general and what it was that he expected in exchange for having “blown hard earned cash and listening to your bullshit” all evening [I would have given you what he wrote, but unfortunately -- or fortunately, if you are a woman in the Washington DC area-- the post was removed].  All I could think as I read this was “Wow, a hostile man who expects oral sex in exchange for dinner?  Why that’s every woman’s dream date!”

Men [and women] can be such morons when it comes to attracting members of the opposite sex.  They will do things that are the antithesis of what it is they want to have happen, and then when it doesn’t happen, they will loudly complain to anyone that will listen that all members of the opposite sex are [fill in the negative stereotype here].  Women tend to do things that are viewed as “playing games.” They will toy with a man’s attention, affection, and, frequently, his genitals and then use emotional blackmail [i.e. tears] to get what they want.  It’s a cruel game, for certain, but for some reason men respond to it, and I think I’ve finally figured out what that reason is — many, many men are just plain stupid.

Now, I know, if you are a man, you’re probably sitting there thinking “WTF?! How can she say men are stupid?  She doesn’t know me!”  And that, my friend, is the root of the problem.  You’ve just jumped into the dangerous waters of ego versus woman.  I say men are stupid and you must immediately prove to me that you are the exception to the rule even though I’ve cast not a single aspersion on your individual character, but I’m going to save that Psych 101 lesson for another post.  Today I want to talk about the men who are haters.  

Haters are the guys that do things that embarrass and shame their fellow man to the point that they will create blogs designed to publicly identify the stupidity of said men and ridicule them in a way that is designed to get them to stop what they’re doing and think [Why Women Hate Men].  Folks, these are the men who not only fail to think about what it actually takes to attract women, they also seem to actively dislike women and, yet, they still want to have sex with them.

What never fails to surprise me about the Haters is that they will openly express their feelings in a way that disparages women. Their insults are used as a means of attracting and seducing a woman, and what amazes me is that they actually believe that a woman might be aroused by this.  A Hater believes that the words “cunt” or a “bitch” are seductive turn-ons and that the liberal use of them will result in a woman falling to her knees as she moans for the privilege of doing nothing more than pleasing him.

These also seem to be the guys who also have a very healthy sense of self. They actually believe that they are the answer to the prayers of every woman on earth [Enough is Enough Ladies].  They have the misguided notion that their own assessment [and over-estimation] of their looks, money and/or sexual prowess will overcome any personality defects and cause women to fall at their feet.  This may work for, oh say, a billionaire, for the average guy, it’s not going to result in a check mark in the “desired qualities” column for any self-respecting woman.

Some Haters will even use reverse psychology to try and attract women.  As if being told that I’ll be a replacement for the ex [or current] girlfriend [who is always a raving lunatic] will be enough to “dare” me into dating or screwing a guy [Single Male Needs Girlfriend].  No dice.

I always wonder what the decent guys think of the Haters.  I did see a response to Mr. No Blow Job, No Second Date, and  I’m fairly certain was another man it was a man who said, “dude, you are a fucktard for so many reasons and you are the reason women are hard to talk to anymore actually i think by reading your post my fucking I.Q. dropped.”  This gives me a small glimmer of hope.

Now, if only I could find a way to address the problem of the women who are attracted to these losers…

What say you?

Basic Instinct, Part 7:

One of the strongest drives taught to men and women early in life is to seek the approval of our peers and masters.  When people fail in this arena, they develop a low self esteem or a hatred for authority, amongst other neurosis.  Knowing how life is supposed to work, and how it was originally designed to work is the basis of ridding oneself of these neuroses.

Torment is not a mental disease, even though it occurs in the brain.  Wild animals are not tormented, but caged animals are tormented.  Animals imprisoned by man, or living amongst man, display various stages of torment.  Yet, domestic animals like dogs and cats freely accept their imprisoned status, as most women also accept their imprisoned status. 

Men, whether women believe it, are also prisoners of society.  Their prison cells might be larger, but that ends any difference between male and female imprisonment and torment.

In the wild, the female chooses which clan’s territory to join.  She is fully aware of enslaving herself to the male in charge of the territory.  She has freely chosen to become a part of that man’s life.  Once her choice is made, she loses all rights to making choices.  Her male dominates her. 

The female instinct allows her to desire this condition.  In fact, she hungers to be dominated by her male.  Without her male’s domination, she is miserable.  Without children, women are confused.  Unless another male overthrows the superiority of her male, she will contently spend her entire life with her male.  This is because wild animals are only using instinct to direct their lives.  If her male is overthrown by another male, she is designed to submit to her new male freely, which behavior is exhibited in modern women on a daily basis, because women are designed to accept the new dominant male, which their instinct perceives is the guy controlling their workplace, the bar, or the gym.  Since the male is designed to fertilize the female whenever she comes into heat, females often stray from the husband due to a new male being on location when they go into heat at another location, other than the home.  

Another natural law is the male is designed to fertilize women many times per day, while the female is not designed for such activity except when she goes into heat, which only occurs sporadically in any given year.  Therefore, we see another natural law.  Men can fertilize ten to twenty women in one day, every day; while a woman will only allow a man to fertilize her during her period of heat, which may only occur once a month. 

This female limitation, imposed upon her by nature, imposes a strain upon her male mate in a monogamist society, because the male can fertilize at least ten to twenty women per day.  Has nature made a mistake?  No!  It seems to be a mistake, but is not a mistake.  It is a purposeful plan imposed upon the lower classes of the human race by the ruling class of a nation in civilization.  Rulers have constructed laws limiting the male to one female.  A nation’s law limiting males to one female is the basis of the male not having the availability of many females to fertilize; and the females not having one male to fertilize many women, when they come into heat.  This causes another problem in civilization.  Many women never get a male to fertilize them, or worse, women wind-up being fertilized by a male that cannot nor will not bear their responsibility to care of that female.  Leaving her to the mercy and scarcity of providing for herself and her children.

Now mathematically speaking, simple logic shows us that if a female only requires the services of her male mate one day per month, then the number of females that will require the same male’s services during that month would be at least thirty females; and they would solely belong to him.  This logic is based upon the thirty females coming into heat on different days during the same month, but many females in one herd can come into heat on the same day; and many other females can come into heat on different days of the month.   Now if the male can service ten to twenty different women each day, every day, then we can multiply the minimum ten women a day by the thirty days of a month culminating in a harem of at least three hundred women for one male.  Then it is necessary to figure in the supplies needed by the one male to provide for his females, and you can begin to see why a male would have to be a king, like King Solomon in the Bible, to provide for his 300 wives and 700 concubines.  Showing us that a normal number of females owned by one male should be a minimum of 300 females.  Not to mention the joy of a female, who does not have to perform sexually everyday for her monogamist male as the sole female trying to satisfy his sexual appetite: which sexual appetite’s demands on the sole wife are considered as another form of enslavement; and not to mention the fact that women desire the company of other women and do never desire the company of men, but only need men for fertilization.  Now you can see why monogamy (one man and one woman cannot work, even though some people are die-hards and remain married for a lifetime).

FIFA 2010

Reprezentanţii Electronic Arts au declarat că elementele noi introduse în FIFA 10 au fost analizate şi sunt rezultatul feedback-ului primit de la jucători după 275 de milioane de sesiuni de joc FIFA 09.

Cateva dintre elementele cu care producătorii lui FIFA 10 se laudă că au fost îmbunătăţite în noul joc sunt: pasele lungi, inteligenţa artificială a portarilor şi mecanica şuturilor.

Sursa: Realitatea.net

HBO Documentary Films: <i>Outrage: Do Ask. Do Tell</i>

Posted by Audiegrl

Outrage: Do Ask. Do Tell

An official selection of the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival, OUTRAGE investigates the hidden lives of some of the country’s most powerful policymakers – from now-retired Idaho Senator Larry Craig, to former New Jersey Governor Jim McGreevy – and examines how these and other politicians have inflicted damage on millions of Americans by opposing gay rights. Equally disturbing, the film explores the mainstream media’s complicity in keeping those secrets, despite the growing efforts to “out” them by gay rights organizations and bloggers.

Congressman Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts)

Through a combination of archival news footage and exclusive interviews with politicians and members of the media, OUTRAGE probes the psychology of a double lifestyle, the ethics of outing closeted politicians, and the double standards that the media upholds in its coverage of the sex lives of gay public figures. As Barney Frank, perhaps the best-known openly gay member of Congress explains, “There is a right to privacy, but not a right to hypocrisy. It is very important that the people who make the law be subject to the law.”
The film also spotlights Michael Rogers, a gay activist and founder of blogACTIVE, a Washington, D.C.-based website dedicated to outing closeted public figures. Rogers feels it is necessary to expose the hypocrisy of those who may live one way in public and another way in private, explaining that his work is not about outing people who are gay, but rather about “reporting on individuals who are working against the community that they then expect to protect them.”
OUTRAGE was written and directed by Kirby Dick; producer, Amy Ziering; executive producers, Tom Quinn, Jason Janego, Ted Sarandos, Chad Griffin, Kimball Stroud, Bruce Brothers and Tectonic Theater Project; co-producer, Tanner Barklow; editors, Doug Blush and Matt Clarke; music, Peter Golub. For HBO: senior producer, Nancy Abraham; executive producer, Sheila Nevins.
Outrage: Do Ask. Do Tell is premiering Monday, October 5 at 9pm only on HBO. For more information, visit HBO.com.

Tufts University BANS SEX in your dorm room while your roommate is there...

Quit being so selective and I am sure you will find someone who will help butter your biscuits....Maybe it's the sour look on your face that prevents someone coming up to you and wanting to make out with you....

Really?  They have to make a rule about it?  What if I am just going to hit it softly and not bother anyone?

This reminds me of a local rap group that helped Tupac get some shine early in his career, Digital Underground and their song, “Freaks of the Industry”

The main part of the song that reminds me of college is this one. It is also the reason that I never lived in the dorms.  Ever.  Period.  Gotta become my own man.

Say you’re G’in’ [G'in'?]
Nobody else is seein’
And the freak that you’re wit’ is in front of you,
Bendin’ over naked, and she’s leanin’ on the dresser [Ooh yeah]
You’re lookin’ at her from the rear [Yeah]
She looks just like Vanessa [The right stuff]

Wow, and she really got better with age if that is possible.

Uh uh, not Vanessa with the singer career,
But the X-rated video queen,
Know what I mean? [Uh huh] A’ight, here’s the scene:

She probably will be anything goes....which is why the song mentions her and not Vanessa Williams

You’re lying on you’re back with your head on the edge of the bed,
The booty’s two feet from your head:
Should you: A, take the time to find a condom,

Don't worry, they are already pregnant!

B, you walk right over and you pound ‘em,

Call me Morimoto of the box! Plus, I need this on a shirt and it might become my new avitar...

C, tell her that you want her love,

Well the answer is D, [D], all of the above.
So you’re freakin’ [freakin'], the furniture’s squeakin’ [squeakin']
She’s tweakin’, sayin’ that she’s weak in the knees.
Cheek to cheek, and pound for pound,
You’re taxin’ it and waxin’ it and workin’ it around,
‘Til the booty starts makin’ that clappin’ sound,
Which is cool, but your friends are chillin’ in the other room.
The clappin’s getting louder, you don’t want them to clown you,
In this situation, what do you do: [What?]
A, you, plain and simply, back up off her
B, you hit it just a little bit softer,
C, you take it out and put it in het butt,
Well, D is what I do, so, yo, listen up:
I put a towel on the floor by the two inch gap under the door
Now they can’t see me any more.
Check the locks so they can’t clock, but they can listen.
There’ll be no bargin’ in and there’ll be no dissin’ [Dissin']
Gettin’ back to my mission, break out the whipped cream and the cherries,
Then I go through all the fly positions:
My head under her leg under my arm under her toe.
She says, ‘I like it when you scream, baby let yourself go.’
I hit it and split it, lick it and quit it.
After the ride, put my clothes on and walk outside,
And before anybody gets a chance to speak,
I say, ‘Yo, don’t say nuttin’, I guess I’m just a freak!’

What more is it to say?  We have all been in that position (with some notable exceptions… I would imagine we can all think of some people who this might not be true for.)

From Laura Batchelor
CNN

(CNN) — A new policy at Tufts University prohibits students in dorms from having sex while their roommate is in the room, according to the university’s 2009-2010 student handbook.

A school spokeswoman says students have expressed concerns over roommate having sex in the dorms.

The Massachusetts university’s formal rule also bars so-called “sexiling” — exiling a roommate from the room so the other roommate can engage in sexual activity.

The new policy “is really about consideration and respect for others and the need for students to be mindful of their roommates’ need for privacy, study and sleep,” university spokeswoman Kim Thurler told CNN.

She said while she did not have an exact number of complaints from students about their roommates’ behavior, “over the last few years, the Office of Residential Life and Learning received approximately a dozen expressions of concern about this issue.”

Callie Morton, a freshman at Tufts, told CNN affiliate WHDH-TV, “If someone is going to go and have sex while their roommate is in the room, I mean I think that’s kind of gross. I think it’s kind of funny that they would have to make a rule about it.” Watch Tufts students talk about policy »

The new guidelines for students hosting overnight guests say, “You may not engage in sexual activity while your roommate is present in the room. And sexual activity within your assigned room should not ever deprive your roommate(s) of privacy, study, or sleep time.”

Other students agree that the new rule is going to be difficult to implement.

“I don’t think it’s something that can really be enforced per se,” an unidentified Tufts University student told WHDH. “I don’t understand how that’s going to work.”

Thurler explained that if a problem is identified and brought to the attention of residence officials, the university will help the affected student have a conversation with his/her roommate to address the situation.

“In some cases, we might intervene on behalf of the student,” Thurler said, “and speak with their roommate directly and explain what is expected of them while they live in the residence halls.”

Thurler wouldn’t comment on possible disciplinary action by the university if a student breaks the rules.

Reading this, (Thanks B for the heads up) made me think of another funny time of when I was in college.

One of our non-posting crew members tells a hilarious story about being in the dorms and it totally applies here.  He was working at the Berkeley Debate Camp and living with a friend, who we will call “Tom” to protect the innocent.   Tom was fortunate in that he had his girlfriend there that summer working.   One night, they thought NCP was alseep and they starting going at it.  NCP rolled over, and acted like he was alseep once he heard, in hopes it would just end quickly.

Sometime during the act, Tom’s girlfriend asked Tom, “Do you think that I am smart?”  This is not a question that I would ask during the act, but who knows what was racing through her mind.  NCP tells this part with a little chuckle, and finishes with the punchline “Yes…. NOW TURN OVER!” and he went back to work.

He could have really believed in her intelligence. But, in that order, I think that he was concerned with something else.

just finishing.....that is what he was after...

By definition, That’s the shit that would get me mad…..

Roman Polanski... was it rape?

So now we hear that it’s ok to have sex with a thirteen year old as long she doesn’t say no.

There’s rape and there’s rape… and well, he IS Roman Rolanski. So he was actually doing her a favor by supposedly getting her so drugged up on champagne and ‘Ludes’ she had NO idea of what was going on.

Quaaludes by themselves are ENOUGH to do that. Trust me on my knowing this… i just made it into my mid-fifties… do the math… ’nuff said?

Anyway, so Roman Polanski supposedly gets this girl doped up and then allegedly proceeds to rape her. Oh yeah, HE says she agreed… i would think he would say that. Who is going to question the Great Roman Polanski? And just why is he so revered?

Be—cause he is one of the greatest directors of all time. Puh-leeze, Chinatown was good… well Faye Dunaway was good, but i kinda think her and Candice Bergen… i’ll stop there.

But the fact remains: anyone else other than the Great Roman Polanski does something like this and they are vilified and the crowds are screaming for their heads on a stake.

Oh, if it wasn’t rape, why did he run off to Europe, always making sure never to enter a country from which he might extradited back to the States from? Hmmmm…?

A forced sexual act whether the person is cognizant of the act or not is RAPE!

Yes RAPE! One, she was WELL under 18. Under the law, she is not capable of giving her consent. Two, she was in NO condition, even if she had been FIVE YEARS OLDER to give her consent. Under either of these conditions she is unable to enter into a contract. And allowing someone to perform a sex act with her constitutes a verbal contract. She was neither old enough or clear-headed enough to enter into said verbal contract.

I’m seeing an unintended consequence here also: if this holds up…
getting a thirteen year old drugged up and taking advantage of her sexually doesn’t qualify as RAPE… the precedent this may set could set womens advocacy, rape prevention and prosecutions back fifty years.

“Well, yer honor… yeah, i knowd she was thirteen, and after a bottle a’ Jim Beam… why hell, neither ov us knew what we was a’doin’. But she was ok with it. I mean she nodded when i asked her ’bout doin’ it.”

Well, if your name is Roman Polanski… it just might work.